So, in a recent post I mentioned wall calendars. Well, I’m sure most of us know by know that with on demand printing, pretty much anyone with a digital camera and a creative side can easily make their own calendar. With that in mind, to date I have created several and used a number of different printers in the process. This post is essentially a review of those services. And maybe if you are thinking about creating your own wall calendar for the upcoming year, you might just find this helpful.
My scale is based on a 1-5 rating system with one being the worst and five being the best.
POD calendar printers I’ve used:
Snapfish.com – Overall rating 4/5
Print quality – 4.5/5 This HP affiliates photo calendars are crisp and clear with very few if any drawbacks.
Pricing – 2.5/5 The pricing is a bit excessive as is the shipping. A decent product might cost around $26.00. If International shipping is required, you can tack on an extra $6.00 to that figure. Not real conducive for reselling.
Paper quality – 4/5 Snapfish provides paper similar in thickness to a medium level of card stock.
Shipping time – 4/5 Buyers will likely get their product in less than a week and probably more like 3-5 days
Vistaprint.com – Overall rating 2.5/5
Print quality – 2.5/5 The business card specialists should stick to smaller items. The photos come across a bit grainy with some color problems.
Pricing – 3.5/5 Vista Print’s calendars usually run around $18.00 plus shipping. They tend to be in the average range here.
Paper quality – 3/5 The paper is nice and glossy but tends to be rather thin.
Shipping time – 3/5 While copies can take several weeks to arrive, they usually come in a relatively reasonable time frame.
Lulu.com – Overall rating 3/5
Print quality – 2.5/5 Much like Vista print, the quality of images can be rather spotty.
Pricing – 4.5/5 Lulu seems to be the most affordable POD service by far. Full-sized calendars start at less than $14.00. These can easily be used for resale purposes.
Paper quality – 3.5/5 The company uses a heavy stock paper but as stated above it seems to hinder the printing.
Shipping time 3/5 The shipping speed is pretty average overall.
*Qoop.com – Overall rating 3.5/5
Print quality – 3.5/5 Qoop produced fairly nice images from photos with few real problems.
Pricing – 4/5 While not quite as reasonable as Lulu, this company was very much competitive in this area.
Paper quality – 3.5/5 Much like the others, they tended to use a decent medium grade card stock paper.
Shipping time 3/5 The time it took to receive the product was pretty typical.
* Qoop.com is now defunct but as I had a positive overall experience with them, I figured it was only right to include them in the list.